STAR Protected
Update 03.28.2019 -- Run 9 pp: charged jet comparisons
I suspect I might have unraveled what's going on between Pythia8 and the embedding. Consider this post:
Webpage for Charm meson weekly meeting
************************************************************
iTPC closeout review May 2, 2019
Final report and experts from the review were received on August 1, 2019
The three documents have been attached
eTOF run19 performance
Below are some performance plots of the eTOF produced with the fast offline data from runs 20066013 and 20066020.
Update 03.08.2019 -- Run 9 embedding: pi0- vs. hadron-triggered pTtrk distributions
The plot continues to thicken surrounding the tracking efficiency mystery. This time around, I'm investigating whether or not there's a physics difference between pi0 and charged hadron triggers
iTPC QA run 19
History of bad/DEAD FEEs and channels. Will be updated as run goes along (last July 15, 2019). Updated plot with corrected sinngle FEEs Jan 2022
Update 03.07.2019 -- Run 9 pp: efficiency double check
This is a brief interlude in my journey to figure out what's different between our Pythia8 simulation and embedding. I wanted to see if it mattered one way or the other with how I calculated the
STAR endcap TOF/CBM TOF meeting
The meeting is scheduled on Bluejeans: https://bluejeans.com/303776107, at 14:15 (GMT), duration : 02:00
STAR endcap TOF/CBM TOF meeting
The meeting is scheduled on Bluejeans: https://bluejeans.com/303776107, at 14:15 (GMT), duration : 02:00