STAR Protected
Update 05.18.2018 -- Run 9 embedding: Jet Reconstruction Efficiency (R = 0.3, Charged)
We need to know the jet reconstruction efficiency to correct the unfolded measured spectrum, so this is a quick study of the reconstruction efficiency for R = 0.3 charged jets. There are essenti
Update 05.16.2018 -- Run 9 pp: EtTrg = 9 - 15 GeV Spectrum
Here are the pTcorr spectra for eTtrg = (9, 15) GeV, R = 0.3, charged recoil jets. The distributions have been normalized by the no. of triggers, eta acceptance, and bin width.
Update 05.16.2018 -- Run 9 pp: R = 0.3 Binning Definition
I've decided on a binning to stick with for the detector recoil jet 'pTcorr' distributions (the 'R = 0.3', charged recoil jet distributions, that is). The last couple of bins for each trigger ha
First look at EP resolution in 27 GeV Au+Au
Update 05.14.2018 -- Run 9 Embedding: Response Matrix Check
Yesterday I took my first stab at calculating the response matrix for R = 0.3 charged jets using the Run 9 dijet embedding:
Update 05.13.2018 -- Run 9 Embedding: Response Matrices
Here is the first stab at the response matrices as calculated using the Run 9 dijet embedding sample.
Update 05.10.2018 -- Run 9 Embedding: Charged Hadron Triggers, Jet Comparisons
Previously, I checked how the track and tower distributions agree between pi0-triggered data (Run 9 L2gamma) and charged hadron-triggered embedding (Run 9 dijet sample):
Update 05.09.2018 -- Run 9 Embedding: Charged Hadron Triggers, FF Check
Up until now, I've only been using the Reversed Full Field (RFF) configuration of the Run 9 dijet embedding. The sample was produced with a Full Field (FF) configuration as well, and s
Update 05.07.2018 -- Run 9 pp: Resolution Study, Final(?) Parameterizations
Since we observe similar behavior in the track resolution between our study and Kolja's, we're ready to move ahead. See these posts for the comparison between the two studies:
Update 05.06.2018 -- Run 9 pp: Resolution Study (Another Method, Log-Scales)
I forgot to put some of the plots in the post on 05/04/2018 in a log-scale, so here's the momentum resolution as calculated from 'pTmc - pTreco' with proper axes:
Update 05.04.2018 -- Run 9 pp: Resolution Check (Another Method)
We are continuing to try to figure out if the tracking resolution in the Run 9 dijet embedding sample is as expected. My previous attempts to calculate the resolution seemed to be wrong, so we g
Update 05.04.2018 -- Run 9 pp: Resolution Check (Another Method)
We are continuing to try to figure out if the tracking resolution in the Run 9 dijet embedding sample is as expected. My previous attempts to calculate the resolution seemed to be wrong, so we g
STAR Preliminary Results Archive
This page collects the preliminary plots approved by STAR.
QM 2018 - net-Lambda fluctuation measurements - QA/cut selection and final results preliminary figures
NOTE: This page is still under construction .... !!!!
Abstract: