STAR Protected
Update 05.07.2018 -- Run 9 pp: Resolution Study, Final(?) Parameterizations
Since we observe similar behavior in the track resolution between our study and Kolja's, we're ready to move ahead. See these posts for the comparison between the two studies:
Update 05.06.2018 -- Run 9 pp: Resolution Study (Another Method, Log-Scales)
I forgot to put some of the plots in the post on 05/04/2018 in a log-scale, so here's the momentum resolution as calculated from 'pTmc - pTreco' with proper axes:
Update 05.04.2018 -- Run 9 pp: Resolution Check (Another Method)
We are continuing to try to figure out if the tracking resolution in the Run 9 dijet embedding sample is as expected. My previous attempts to calculate the resolution seemed to be wrong, so we g
Update 05.04.2018 -- Run 9 pp: Resolution Check (Another Method)
We are continuing to try to figure out if the tracking resolution in the Run 9 dijet embedding sample is as expected. My previous attempts to calculate the resolution seemed to be wrong, so we g
STAR Preliminary Results Archive
This page collects the preliminary plots approved by STAR.
QM 2018 - net-Lambda fluctuation measurements - QA/cut selection and final results preliminary figures
NOTE: This page is still under construction .... !!!!
Abstract:
Update 04.30.2018 -- Run 9 pp: Resolution Widths (No QA Cuts)
Even after removing the cut on 'pTreco', the widths of the track resolution distribution still don't look right: the minimum is in the wrong place (~2 GeV/c vs.
Update 04.29.2018 -- Run 14 AuAu: Recoil Jet Check
To check our AuAu signal, I calculated the recoil jet pTcorr spectrum in AuAu using my jet reconstruction code.
Update 04.29.2018 -- Run 9 pp: Resolution Widths (No PtReco cut)
Following up from the previous post:
Update 04.26.2018 -- Run 9 pp: Resolution Width (Different Calculation)
The odd results I obtained previously have cast doubts on how I was calculating the resolution width: