STAR Protected
Update 07.19.2018 -- Run 9 data: gamma-rich purity (proper binning)
I think I've already uploaded a plot like this, but here's the gamma-rich purity as a function of 'eTtrg' binned according to our usual binning scheme. The first plot is the "exclusive"
Update 07.19.2018 -- Run 9 data: charged recoil jet spectra vs. eTtrg (R = 0.2)
Below are the R = 0.2 charged recoil jet spectra for pi0 and gamma-rich triggers as a function of 'eTtrg'. (Apologies for the wacky aspect ratios...)
Update 07.19.2018 -- Run 9 data: charged recoil jet spectra vs. eTtrg (R = 0.2)
Below are the R = 0.2 charged recoil jet spectra for pi0 and gamma-rich triggers as a function of 'eTtrg'. (Apologies for the wacky aspect ratios...)
Collaboration Meeting Slides -- July 18th, 2018
Slides shown during the JetCorr parallel session of the July 2018 Collaboration Meeting at Lehigh University.
Update 07.11.2018 -- Run 9 embedding: jet energy resolution, corrected response matrix
For reference, here's the jet energy resolution from the response matrix after correcting the reconstruction efficiency:
Update 07.11.2018 -- Run 9 embedding: unfolding binning check
The last time I attempted to unfold R = 0.3 charged jets, the result was pretty wiggly. This might be due to the binning...
Plots obtained with BDT
Plots in the 2-6 GeV/c range for 0-10 % centrality obtained using BDT.
All pT and centrality bins - traditional analysis Dpm signal
Correct-sign and scaled wrong-sign combinations and signal plots after subtractions for all pT and centrality bins.
Update 07.10.2018 -- Run 9 embedding: match candidate qT distribution
Just for reference, here's the 'qT' distribution for all match candidates (i.e. all detector jets within acceptance with 'dR < Rjet' relative to the particle jet trying to be matched).
Update 07.10.2018 -- Run 9 embedding: our efficiency vs. h-jet efficiency
Before I had checked our efficiency compares to the corresponding efficiency from the h-jet analysis:
Jetcorr Paper Status
Measurement of inclusive charged-jet production in Au+Au collisions at sqrt(s_NN) = 200 GeV
Jan Rusnak, Jana Bielcikova, Peter Jacobs
Update 07.09.2018 -- Run 9 embedding: response matrix before vs. after correcting reconstruction efficiency
Just to get an idea of how big the corrections are in the response matrix, I've compared the response matrix after fixing the reconstruction efficiency (which can be found in the 1st link) to the resp
Update 07.09.2018 -- Run 9 embedding: qT comparisons
After fixing the reconstruction efficiency (see link below), I was curious about how the 'qT' cuts affect the reconstruction efficiency and response matrix. Here's a quick comparison:
Update 07.09.2018 -- Run 9 data: 1st stab at unfolding R = 0.3 charged pi0 recoil jets
Using the corrected reconstruction efficiency and response matrix (in the link below), I tried unfolding the R = 0.3 charged recoil jet (pi0 trigger) data.