Home » Groups

STAR Protected

All pT and centrality bins - traditional analysis Dpm signal

Updated on Fri, 2018-07-13 13:00. Originally created by licenrob on 2018-07-11 07:50.

 Correct-sign and scaled wrong-sign combinations and signal plots after subtractions for all pT and centrality bins.

Update 07.10.2018 -- Run 9 embedding: match candidate qT distribution

Updated on Tue, 2019-02-19 10:47. Originally created by dmawxc on 2018-07-10 16:55.

Just for reference, here's the 'qT' distribution for all match candidates (i.e. all detector jets within acceptance with 'dR < Rjet' relative to the particle jet trying to be matched).

Update 07.10.2018 -- Run 9 embedding: our efficiency vs. h-jet efficiency

Updated on Tue, 2019-02-19 10:48. Originally created by dmawxc on 2018-07-10 16:29.

Before I had checked our efficiency compares to the corresponding efficiency from the h-jet analysis:

Jetcorr Paper Status

Updated on Tue, 2018-07-10 08:41. Originally created by yili on 2018-07-10 08:41.

Measurement of inclusive charged-jet production in Au+Au collisions at sqrt(s_NN) = 200 GeV
Jan Rusnak, Jana Bielcikova, Peter Jacobs

Update 07.09.2018 -- Run 9 embedding: response matrix before vs. after correcting reconstruction efficiency

Updated on Tue, 2019-02-19 10:48. Originally created by dmawxc on 2018-07-09 15:52.

Just to get an idea of how big the corrections are in the response matrix, I've compared the response matrix after fixing the reconstruction efficiency (which can be found in the 1st link) to the resp

Update 07.09.2018 -- Run 9 embedding: qT comparisons

Updated on Tue, 2019-02-19 10:49. Originally created by dmawxc on 2018-07-09 15:03.

After fixing the reconstruction efficiency (see link below), I was curious about how the 'qT' cuts affect the reconstruction efficiency and response matrix.  Here's a quick comparison:

SPIN 2018 -- Gluon Helicity at STAR

Updated on Tue, 2019-01-08 12:21. Originally created by dilks on 2018-07-09 13:41.

Abstract: https://drupal.sta

Update 07.09.2018 -- Run 9 data: 1st stab at unfolding R = 0.3 charged pi0 recoil jets

Updated on Tue, 2019-02-19 10:49. Originally created by dmawxc on 2018-07-09 13:20.

Using the corrected reconstruction efficiency and response matrix (in the link below), I tried unfolding the R = 0.3 charged recoil jet (pi0 trigger) data.

Update 07.09.2018 -- Run 9 embedding: closure tests using corrected reconstruction efficiency

Updated on Tue, 2019-02-19 10:49. Originally created by dmawxc on 2018-07-09 13:05.

Previously, I had corrected the jet reconstruction efficiency and response matrix from the Run 9 dijet embedding sample:

Council meeting Lehigh July 18

Updated on Mon, 2018-07-09 11:25. Originally created by videbaks on 2018-07-09 10:57.
 
Draft Agenda

STAR Council meeting, July 18th, 2018

Update 07.05.2018 -- Run 9 embedding: corrected reconstruction efficiency

Updated on Tue, 2019-02-19 10:49. Originally created by dmawxc on 2018-07-05 15:29.

Previously, I had looked into the effect of requiring a trigger at the particle-level on our jet reconstruction efficiency:

QM18 proceedings

Updated on Tue, 2025-01-14 12:00. Originally created by rksooraj on 2018-07-03 21:32.

June 2018

Updated on Mon, 2018-09-10 15:16. Originally created by genevb on 2018-07-02 11:00.

STAR Newsletter

June 2018 edition

Archives

DNP abstracts

Updated on Mon, 2018-07-02 09:14. Originally created by videbaks on 2018-07-02 09:14.

 Abstract for DNP  fall meeting two in all for 

QM proceeding draft

Updated on Mon, 2019-09-23 22:47. Originally created by ywu27 on 2018-06-29 16:32.

 

Update 06.28.2018 -- Run 9 embedding: jet reconstruction efficiency fit

Updated on Tue, 2019-02-19 10:54. Originally created by dmawxc on 2018-06-28 16:52.

Earlier I looked into our jet reconstruction efficiency:

Update 06.28.2018 -- Run 9 embedding: using phi vs. delta-phi and particle-lvl. triggers in matching

Updated on Tue, 2019-02-19 10:54. Originally created by dmawxc on 2018-06-28 13:55.

Yesterday, I investigated a bug in our matching code and the impact of a max 'qT' cut:

Update 06.27.2018 -- Run 9 embedding: applying a max qT cut

Updated on Tue, 2019-02-19 10:54. Originally created by dmawxc on 2018-06-27 16:27.

Previously, we had realized we weren't handling the jet-matching in the best manner.  The new (and old) matching algorithms are described in this post:

JetCorr Follow-Up [05.29.2018] -- STAR vs. PHENIX Purity

Updated on Tue, 2019-02-19 10:54. Originally created by dmawxc on 2018-06-26 12:01.

During my presentation to JetCorr on May 29th, 2018 (see link at the end of this post), some were curious about why it is that the PHENIX data on slide 9 are systematically higher and have smaller err

For EC and ED(s)

Updated on Tue, 2018-10-23 03:45. Originally created by zhux on 2018-06-23 21:18.
 

Embedding instructions for EC and ED(s)