STAR Protected
iTPC review rehearsal
1-224, at 13:30 (GMT), duration : 07:30
Please upload talks to this page.
here is a link to Tonko's talk
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1RKWSU-DfAqQJjCHq8fVGTkTDXrSOf0O3FxVhU_Nx8mU/edit?usp=sharing
here is qinghua's link
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/MWPC_review_Sep2018_v3.pdf
| Time | Talk | Presenter |
|---|---|---|
| 10:00 | iTPC introduction ( 00:30 ) 1 file | Flemming Videbæk |
| 10:30 | itpc cost schedue commisioning ( 00:20 ) 1 file | F.Videbæk |
| 10:50 | iTPC Software ( 00:20 ) 3 files | Irakli |
| 11:10 | iTPC Electronics ( 00:20 ) 1 file | Tonko |
| 11:30 | MWPC production & test at Shandong ( 00:30 ) 1 file | Qinghua Xu |
| 13:00 | iTPC sector test at BNL ( 00:10 ) 1 file | |
| 13:10 | Sector Installation ( 00:20 ) 1 file | Rahul Sharma (BNL) |
itpc software
FV office, at 14:00 (GMT), duration : 01:00
| Time | Talk | Presenter |
|---|---|---|
| 10:00 | iTPC Software ( 00:20 ) 1 file | Irakli |
ATHIC2018 conference
This blog is for ATHIC 2018 conference. Which will include the abstract and slides.
Update 09.28.2018 -- Run 9 pp: Unfolding Results With Different PtTrk Cut (9 - 11 GeV Pi0 Triggers, R = 0.2, Charged Jets)
Earlier this week, we discovered that we had been using two different constituent cuts between p+p and Au+Au: in p+p, I had been using pTtrk = (0.2, 20) GeV/c; and in Au+Au, Nihar had been using pTtrk
Update 09.27.2018 -- Correct Data Point Locator
I put together that estimates the "correct" location for a data point in a really wide bin. The way it works is like so:
JetCorr Follow-Up [09.24.2018] -- Closure Tests
Following up from the recent JetCorr weekly pwg meeting:
itpc review prep
some material for review
- draft overview talk FV
- agenda
- panel members
- charge
Update 09.24.2018 -- Run 9 pp: Unfolding Systematics (No Bin-By-Bin Comparison And Better Summing), 9 - 11 GeV Pi0 (R = 0.2)
Following up from the last post,
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/blog/dmawxc/update-09222018-run-9-pp-unfolding-systematics-9-11-gev-pi0-r-02
iTPC software
room 1-189 in Physics, at 15:00 (GMT), duration : 01:00
connection information
Phone Dial-in
+1.408.740.7256 (United States)
+1.888.240.2560 (US Toll Free)
+1.408.317.9253 (Alternate
| Time | Talk | Presenter |
|---|---|---|
| 11:00 | comparison of voltage ( 00:20 ) 1 file | Maria Stefaniak (Warsaw University of Tech, Subatech) |
JetCorr Update -- September 24th, 2018
Slides for the weekly JetCorr meeting on September 24th, 2018.
Update 09.22.2018 -- Run 9 pp: Unfolding Systematics, 9 - 11 GeV Pi0 (R = 0.2)
After the previous iteration (see the link below), we refined how we're calculating the systematic uncertainties.
Update 09.21.2018 -- Pythia: Fitting Pi0 and Gamma-Direct Spectra With Power Laws
As we move forward with the unfolding, we'd like to use a power law as a prior. So here are 4 spectra from Pythia fitted with power laws (that way we have a reasonable estimate of what the defau
Update 09.20.2018 -- With And 'Without' Unfolding Errors In RooUnfold
Just to verify what's going into the error bars RooUnfold returns, I unfolded our pi0-triggered (9 - 11 GeV) data twice (with all of the same unfolding parameters): once with all of the default option
Update 09.20.2018 -- Run 9 pp: Default vs. Efficiency +- 5% With No Errors on Efficiency (R = 0.2 Charged Jets)
Yesterday I checked what happens when I fix the response matrix, but change the efficiency:
JetCorr Follow-Up [09.11.2018] -- Closure Tests With Bayesian And SVD Unfolding
Something seems to be going on with the SVD algorithm in our correction scheme:
Update 09.18.2018 -- Run 9 pp: Default Unfolding vs. Efficiency +- 5% With Fixed Response Matrix (R = 0.2 Charged Jets)
Following up from earlier today:
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/blog/dmawxc/update-09182018-run-9-pp-default-unfolding-vs-efficiency-5-r-02-charged-jets