STAR Protected

Update 07.31.2019 -- Run 9 pp: Comparing Unfolding Vs. Correcting Bin-By-Bin

I'm continuing to investigate the discrepancy between the data unfolded with our Pythia8 response and our Pytha6 response.  A summary of the issue and investigation thus far can be found here:

Update 07.31.2019 -- Run 9 pp: Comparing Unfolding Vs. Correcting Bin-By-Bin

I'm continuing to investigate the discrepancy between the data unfolded with our Pythia8 response and our Pytha6 response.  A summary of the issue and investigation thus far can be found here:

Gamma-Jet Meeting [08.01.2019]

Slides and errata for the gamma-jet meeting on August 1st, 2019.

Update 07.29.2019 -- Run 9 embedding: Matching Jets In Our Pythia8 Simulation vs. In Our Embedding Sample

I am continuing to investigate the discrepancy between two sets of unfolded data, one unfolded with a response generated in our standalone Pythia8 simulation and the other unfolded with a response cal

JetCorr meeting July 26, 2019

 

Run15 Jpsi RpA paper

This page collects the supporting materials for Run15 J/psi RpA

Update 07.24.2019 -- Run 9 embedding: Comparing Pythia6 Responses For Different Trigger Species

A few days back I compared the effect on unfolded data due to responses made with different species of trigger (pi0 vs. charged hadrons):

Update 07.24.2019 -- Run 9 pp: Comparing Responses and Effects Thereof Between an Unsmeared Pythia8 and a Pi0-Triggered Pythia6

Yesterday, I speculated that maybe the difference between the pi0-triggered Pythia8 corrections and the pi0-triggered Pythia6 corrections might be a question of tracking resolution.  More specifi

Update 07.23.2019 -- Run 9 pp: Comparing Jet Response Between Pythia6 and Pythia8 With Pi0 Triggers

Yesterday, I noticed that using the Pythia6 (embedding) response generated using pi0 triggers vs.

Update 07.22.2019 -- Run 9 pp: Comparing Effect on Unfolding Data Using Embedding Response With Different Trigger Species

Previously, I was looking into the difference between unfolding data using a Pythia8 generated response and a Pythia6 (embedding) generated response:

Update 07.22.2019 -- Run 9 pp: Comparing Effect On Unfolding Data Using Pythia8 Response With Different Combos Of Triggers

Previously, I was looking into the difference between unfolding data using a Pythia8 generated response and a Pythia6 (embedding) generated response:

Embedding status and priority

Green: done; Blue: planne

TPC summary for run19

 Following the run-19 there are are a number of actions that has to be done ahead of RUN-20

TPC summary for run19

 Following the run-19 there are are a number of actions that has to be done ahead of RUN-20

Update 07.10.2019 -- Run 9 pp: Comparing Data Unfolded With Pythia8 Priors Vs. Pythia6 Priors

This is a follow-up to this post:

Production Priorities

Last updated on March 15, 2020. New list can be found at 

  • yezhenyu's blog
  • Read more
  • QA of AuAu200_production2_2016 st_physics stream data MuDst -> picoDst conversion production with SL19c

    I have analyzed run 17169117 with KFP to check covariant matrix. It is ok.

    FMS pico transfer request

    Update 07.01.2019 -- Run 9 pp: Comparing Data Unfolded With Embedding Response Vs. Data Unfolded With Pythia8

    This is a continuation of this post:

    Update 07.01.2019 -- Run 9 pp: Unfolding After Various Fixes

    Following up from the post below, it's time to try to unfold.  This should tell us whether or not everything is all okay in our parameterization of the response.