Output files of inner hybrid (v2.1)
Updated on Sun, 2019-11-10 22:25. Originally created by jndong on 2019-10-21 02:23.output files of inner hybrid (v2.1)
Output files of outer hybrid (v2.2)
Updated on Mon, 2019-10-21 02:31. Originally created by jndong on 2019-10-21 01:37.Modification: Locations of the APV25 chips on outer hybrid
Weekly Meeting (Oct. 21)
-ZZ: paper proposal
- Xiaoxuan: pAu calibration updates
- Minghui: suggest to start preparation for Run-17 calibration
27GeV Proton nHitsFit Comparison
Updated on Sat, 2019-10-19 10:09. Originally created by yuzhang1 on 2019-10-19 07:17.
qm2019 Support Material
Updated on Tue, 2019-10-22 08:12. Originally created by dingwei on 2019-10-18 23:11.TPC Run 17 pp500 SC&GL
Updated on Fri, 2020-03-13 07:49. Originally created by posik on 2019-10-18 14:56.Final Run 17 pp510 SC&GL Calibration used in Run17 P20ia reproduction: pdf
q2 v2 dependence of the R correlator
Updated on Fri, 2019-10-18 13:26. Originally created by fengyich on 2019-10-18 12:40.
v1 analysis with AuAu@27 GeV
Updated on Thu, 2019-10-31 10:18. Originally created by lxy1122 on 2019-10-18 11:21.This is the continuous work of what Mike did over one year ago with the fast offline data.
FST Test Stand Cable PO Documentation from PO 0000363726
Updated on Fri, 2019-10-18 10:36. Originally created by capotosto on 2019-10-18 10:36.
HF minutes 2019/10/17
Updated on Fri, 2019-10-18 00:30. Originally created by zbtang on 2019-10-18 00:30.1) Systematic uncertainty of J/psi in pAu - Yanfang Liu
Materials for Discussion
Updated on Thu, 2019-10-17 14:50. Originally created by jwebb on 2019-10-17 14:06.Reference
Talk time : 16:00, Duration : 00:20
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1NuQk6_X2RfM7CPnCb7DVtoPirItSwHZmOV5ZS20ttNs/edit?
S&C Offline Software
Updated on Thu, 2019-10-17 14:05. Originally created by jwebb on 2019-10-17 14:05.1-189, at 20:00 (GMT), duration : 01:00
Offline roundtable.
| Time | Talk | Presenter |
|---|---|---|
| 16:00 | Materials for Discussion ( 00:20 ) 0 files |
Run 17 beam positions
Updated on Fri, 2019-10-18 23:14. Originally created by genevb on 2019-10-17 12:25.STAR Forward Silicon Tracker Meeting
Updated on Mon, 2019-10-21 10:53 by videbaks. Originally created by yezhenyu on 2019-10-17 11:22.https://bluejeans.com/101020434 , at 14:30 (GMT), duration : 01:00
Would it be possible to have a meeting (remote) on this tomorrow Friday pref in the morning. (10/18)
-discussion
a) what went wrong here (my interpretaation of mike e-mail)
b) what is the correct design
c) who/when will it be done
c) signoff before we proceed as its clearly not ready for production as mike put the assembly on hold
n Need to update documentationoduction.
Mike’s e-mail,
Not sure who to address this to - I've asked the vendor to hold off on putting the test stand cables on the T-board, as I've noticed some discrepancies. (Very good).
The attached Excel spreadsheet from Steve Valentino was used when ordering the test stand cables. Each wire/pair is labeled using the "Via Ref Des" column, in column "G", which corresponds to the D-Sub connector pin listed in column A.
When compared to the schematic for T-Board V2.0 the Via Ref Des is incorrect - the correct values according to the schematic are listed in Column I. This affected only OUT0 through OUT3. They are in reverse order, and some also have polarity reversed. This affects the first V2.0 test T-Boards we assembled.
Zhenyu, I believe these were sent to you, if so just be aware.
When compared to the T-Board V2.1 the Via Ref Des is incorrect - the correct values according to the schematic are listed in Column J. This affected only OUT0 through OUT2. OUT3 is correctly labeled. OUT0 through OUT2 all have polarity reversed.
I do not know the reason for the Via Ref Des changes between schematic/pcb revisions, or why the spreadsheet appears incorrect for both V2.0 and V2.1.
I would appreciate it if someone could tell me if my assumption regarding the correct labeling for the cable should be what I’ve listed in Column J, and if not let me know what it should be.
Who designed the version 2.1. Who double checked it?
We seem to be lacking some QA process.
10/18 - message
After checking all versions for T-board, I find that Column G is related to the original version which wasn't produced, and Column I related to T2.0，
Column J related to T2.1.
The changes for different versions are just for easy and quick routing.
I'm sorry I didn't figure it out clearly when I updated the design.
Is it possible to update the mapping now?
191017 HF Weekly Meeting
Updated on Thu, 2019-10-17 08:51. Originally created by liuyf on 2019-10-17 08:51.
Updated errors to c->e v1 and b,c->e RAA
Updated on Thu, 2019-10-17 01:06. Originally created by mkelsey on 2019-10-17 01:06.QM_slides_focusmeet
Updated on Thu, 2019-10-17 01:50. Originally created by apandav on 2019-10-17 00:59.