Comments from the Institute of Particle Physics
1) Title: Femtoscopy in p+ p collisions at RHIC ->
Femtoscopy in p+ p collisions at \sqrt_{s} = 200 GeV ?
2) Abstract: line 1 and line 4, p+p -> $p+p$
line1/2 at 200 GeV -> at \sqrt_{s} = 200 GeV
3) Line 111, up to 200 GeV -> up to \sqrt_{s} = 200 GeV
Line 112, d+Au -> $d+\mathrm{Au}$
Line 131, in the soft sector-i.e. at low pt. ->
in the soft sector, i.e., at low pt.
4) Line 193, The paper is organized as follows ->
The rest of the paper is organized as follows
5) Line 221, $Q_{inv}$ -> $Q_{\mathrm{inv}}$, everywhere,
$R_{inv}$ -> $R_{\mathrm{inv}}$, everywhere
6) Line 228 and 236, “o,” “l” and “s” ->
“$o$” “$l$” and “$s$”
7) Line 430, 439, ... MeV/c -> $\mathrm{MeV}/c$, everywhere
8) III Analysis details, are there any nhit, dca cuts in your
analysis?
9) Line 481, GeV/c -> $\mathrm{GeV}/c$, everywhere
10）.In line 689, is it "pT-dependence" or "mT-dependence"?
11) Line 749, 808, $Au + Au$ -> $\mathrm{Au} + \mathrm{Au}$
Line 782, 803, 805, p+p -> $p+p$
Line 803, A+A -> $A+A$ or $AA$
12) Line 812, 813, why we need "-" here?
13) Fig 1, could we make the label "q_{o, s, l} [GeV/c]" larger? The
label size for different Fig are different, Should we make them same ?
14) Fig 3 and 5, $A_{22}^{RE}$ overlaped with data points.
15) Fig 7, caption, $R_{inv}$ -> $R_{\mathrm{inv}}$. Same thing in the
table V, VI, VII.
16) Fig 8, try this if PAs used root,
<dNch/deta> -> #LT dN_{ch}#/deta #GT, also, $R_{inv}$ ->
$R_{\mathrm{inv}}$.
17) Fig 9, $Au+Au$, $Cu+Cu$ -> $\mathrm{Au} + \mathrm{Au}$,
\mathrm{Cu} + \mathrm{cu}.
18) Fig 11, 12, <dNch/deta> -> #LT dN_{ch}#/deta #GT. same as Fig 8.
19) Fig 14, the label for the x axis should be a little bit far away
from the axis.
20) reference [1] - [4], the journal information should be added.
(Please check all references.) Actually, it seems we don't need the arxiv
number if the paper has been published.reference [14], why we need website here?