Sort by:[Date]

2005 Inclusive Jet pT Shifts and Trigger/Reconstruction Bias TAKE 2

 

Study of ET correction factor Calorimeter only geometry

ET Correction Factor Calorimeter Only Geometry

 

Early look at 2008 MIP peak

The following plot shows the location in ADCs (pedestal subtracted) of the mip peak for each eta ring using pp data from day 47. The attached PDF shows the spectra for each ring and the fits.

Heavy Flavor meeting

 09 September : update

2006 Inclusive Jet pT Shifts and Trigger and Reconstruction Bias - TAKE 2

 

pixel geometry

  • test of upgr15 with DEV library 

Chain used :

Like-sign and unlike-sign asymmetry

In the ongoing effort to figure out what's wrong with my calculated 2005 asymmetries, the like-sign (A_ls) and unlike-sign (A_us) asymmetries, as defined 

Run 6 Data / Monte Carlo Comparison

Partonic Cross Sections

xsec = {
'3_4' : 1.302,
'4_5' : 3.158E-01,
'5_7' : 1.372E-01,
'7_9' : 2.290E-02,
'9_11' : 5.495E-03,
'11_15' : 2.220E-03,
'15_25' : 3.907E-04,
'25_35' : 1.074E-05,
'35_45' : 5.000E-07,
'45_55' : 2.857E-08,
'55_65' : 1.451E-09
}

Normalization Procedure

I calculated the integrated luminosity for my dataset (5.43 pb^-1) and scaled all event- and jet-level histograms by that amount (in mb^-1 to match the partonic xsec numbers above). For the track histograms I added a multiplicative factor of 0.82 to account for imperfect PID efficiency in the data. I neglected PID contamination.

Embedding tests: 9.2 GeV Au+Au in SL08d

It was reported that the tuning of the scale factor (Normalization Factor in TRS) was giving different results in SL08c library at PDSF and RCF (see

constructing a webpage

 Bernd has asked that I put the details of my analysis into a static webpage (not a blog post like this one), but in order to get things in order in my head, this is where I'm starting.