- videbaks's home page
- Posts
- 2025
- February (1)
- 2024
- 2023
- 2022
- 2021
- 2020
- 2019
- 2018
- December (1)
- November (2)
- October (1)
- September (1)
- August (1)
- July (4)
- April (3)
- March (1)
- February (2)
- January (1)
- 2017
- 2016
- November (1)
- September (2)
- August (2)
- July (1)
- June (1)
- May (1)
- April (1)
- March (1)
- February (1)
- January (1)
- 2015
- 2014
- 2013
- 2012
- 2011
- 2010
- November (3)
- 2009
- My blog
- Post new blog entry
- All blogs
geant pbar absorbtion
Updated on Thu, 2023-05-04 11:53. Originally created by videbaks on 2023-04-24 09:55.
The default way of running geant utilized GHESIA for cross sections, in particular absorption.
BRAHMS looked at this for the 2002 p-bar/p letter and found it was inadaquate. ALICE in their papers from
~2013 also investigated this in the pp paper dealing with the p-bar/p vs energy paper.
Her I put some of this information.
- This is an ensemble of e-mails and some plots by Pawel Stazsel from 2001
- Physics Letter from ALICE detailing p-bar efficiencies pdf
- The key figues from 2 is here showing the difference between the geant and fluka efficinecy. This is not the final correction difference which depends on the material budgets which is shown in the second plot.
- For STAR at mid-rapidity and the runs w/o HFT there is very little material at mid-rapidity, thus expect the effects to be order 1% at most For run run 14-16 it is certainly different and should be quantified.,
Efeect of p and pbar for ALICE
Summary request to S&C is the attached pdf
»
- videbaks's blog
- Login or register to post comments