BSMD Calibration - A few plots (test)
BSMD Calibration - Additional Plots
Monday June 29th 2009
M.J.M. Codrington
Texas A&M University
For previous updates, please click here, and here.
Calibration Method 2 - Additional Plots
Fitting the ADC histograms with a higher order exponential, for example, one of the form;
should yield a better fit, than a simple exponential. However, the two parameters P1 and P2 do not directly translate to a relative gain per strip, and therefore, do not separately carry useful information about SMD gain variation. These two parameters must somehow be combined, to give one parameter that can be interpreted as a gain.
We found two possible solutions, for this problem. ;
Function 1
Where α = average value of P2P1
Function 2
Where β = average value of P2P12
In the following results, the two functions, Function 1 and Function 2 will be referred to as F1 and F2 respectively.
Calibration Results
Live Strips are defined as those strips that;
1. Had greater than 100 entries before calibration
2. Did not yield a negative slope with fit from 1 – 130 ADC channels (the slope was multiplied by -1, so this flagged those strips, with a positive initial slope)
3. Strips that had > 0% calibration
Function & |
Live Strips |
F1 – SMD-η |
14,873 |
F1 – SMD-φ |
15,674 |
F2 – SMD-η |
14,876 |
F2 – SMD-φ |
15,674 |
Table 1 – Live Strips
Calibrated and Non-Calibrated Strips
Function & SMD Plane |
Calibrated Strips |
Negative Divergence |
Positive Divergence |
Negative Overshoot |
Positive Overshoot |
F1 – SMD-η |
12,747 |
786 |
300 |
748 |
292 |
F1 – SMD-φ |
12,266 |
1,098 |
1,549 |
333 |
428 |
F2 – SMD-η |
12,494 |
644 |
188 |
1,058 |
492 |
F2 – SMD-φ |
12,668 |
794 |
1,227 |
438 |
547 |
Table 2 – Numbers of Calibrated and Non-Calibrated SMD-η & SMD-φ Strips for Calibration with F1 & F2
Function & SMD Plane |
% Calibrated Strips |
% Negative Divergence |
% Positive Divergence |
% Negative Overshoot |
% Positive Overshoot |
F1 – SMD-η |
85.71 |
5.28 |
2.02 |
5.03 |
1.96 |
F1 – SMD-φ |
78.26 |
7.01 |
9.88 |
2.12 |
2.73 |
F2 – SMD-η |
83.99 |
4.33 |
1.26 |
7.11 |
3.31 |
F2 – SMD-φ |
80.82 |
5.07 |
7.83 |
2.79 |
3.49 |
Table 3 – Percentages of Calibrated and Non-Calibrated SMD-η & SMD-φ Strips for Calibration with F1 & F2
SMD-Eta Plots
Note: The following plots are only for Function 1 only
Extracted Gains
Plotted Against Rapidity
FigE1 - Before Calibration
Plotted Against Strip Number
FigE3 - Before Calibration
Error of Extracted Gains
Plotted Against Rapidity
FigE5 - Before Calibration
Plotted Against Strip Number
FigE7 - Before Calibration
Yield at Slope
Plotted Against Rapidity
Plotted Against Strip Number
FigE10 - After Calibration
ChiSquared per Degree of Freedom
Plotted Against Rapidity
FigE11 - Before Calibration
Plotted Against Strip Number
FigE13 - Before Calibration
SMD-Phi Plots
Extracted Gains
Plotted Against Rapidity
FigP1 - Before Calibration
Plotted Against Strip Number
FigP3 - Before Calibration
Error of Extracted Gains
Plotted Against Rapidity
FigP5 - Before Calibration
Plotted Against Strip Number
FigP7 - Before Calibration
Yield at Slope
Plotted Against Rapidity
Plotted Against Strip Number
FigP10 - After Calibration
ChiSquared per Degree of Freedom
Plotted Against Rapidity
Fig P11 - Before Calibration
Plotted Against Strip Number
FigP13 - Before Calibration
Change in RMS
The change in the RMS of the gains, before and after calibration (for both functions); is shown in the histograms below.
Figure 9 – RMS of SMD-η Gains (Function 1 & Function 2) vs. Pseudo-Rapidity Bin (Before & After Calibration)
Figure 9 – RMS of SMD-η Gains (Function 1 & Function 2) vs. Pseudo-Rapidity Bin (Before & After Calibration)
- martinc's blog
- Login or register to post comments