- jlzhang's home page
- Posts
- 2024
- March (1)
- 2022
- 2021
- December (1)
- 2019
- April (1)
- 2018
- 2017
- 2016
- 2015
- December (1)
- November (1)
- September (3)
- August (1)
- May (1)
- April (1)
- March (4)
- February (5)
- January (3)
- 2014
- December (4)
- November (4)
- October (2)
- September (3)
- August (4)
- July (3)
- June (4)
- May (2)
- April (1)
- March (2)
- February (2)
- January (1)
- 2013
- My blog
- Post new blog entry
- All blogs
How ET PT matching impact W findding?
In previous study, we met the discrepancy between Data and Embedding during the background estimation procedure. One of the possible reason is the mis-matching between track pT and EMC ET. To investigate the impact from this case, we can just see the shape of the Jacobian peak in different ET/pT cuts. If this is the key reason lead to the discrepancy, there should be significant changes on the "Jacobian Peak" for different ET/pT shape. The following plots are for different luminosity ranges for both W+ and W-.
1. Full sample
1.1 W+, (Different color stand for different ET/pT cuts.)
1.1.1 Data:
1.1.2 Embedding:
1.2 Full sample: W-
1.2.1 Data:
1.2.2 Embedding:
2. Low luminosity:
2.1 W+
2.1.1 Data:
2.1.2 Embedding:
2.2 Low Luminosity W-:
2.2.1 Data:
2.2.2 Embedding:
3. High Luminosity:
3.1 W+
3.1.1 Data:
3.1.2 Embedding
3.2 High Luminosity: W-
3.2.1 Data:
3.2.2 Embedding:
For above plots, we can't see clear indication that the mis-matching between ET and pT lead to the Peak shape change.
? can we pass this possible reason with these checking ?
- jlzhang's blog
- Login or register to post comments