Previously, I had corrected the jet reconstruction efficiency and response matrix from the Run 9 dijet embedding sample:

https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/blog/dmawxc/update-07052018-run-9-embedding-corrected-reconstruction-efficiency

With those in hand, I present some closure tests below.  First using the RFF+FF response to unfold the RFF+FF detector spectrum:

Ignore the wacky behavior at 'pTjet = 0', that's just ROOT being difficult.  Next is the FF spectrum unfolded using the RFF response:

And lastly the RFF spectrum unfolded using the FF response:

Generally speaking, things seem to be under control (considering the backfolded distributions).  There are some pretty serious wiggles in the unfolded distributions, though; these might be due to my binning, or it could be that I that I used the wrong prior / smeared prior distribution...
Note: these are all R = 0.3 charged jets, not R = 0.2. That's a typo.