- bouchet's home page
- Posts
- 2016
- 2015
- December (1)
- November (3)
- October (2)
- September (2)
- August (2)
- June (2)
- April (5)
- March (2)
- February (3)
- January (2)
- 2014
- December (2)
- November (2)
- October (3)
- September (2)
- August (3)
- July (1)
- June (3)
- May (6)
- April (6)
- March (1)
- February (2)
- January (1)
- 2013
- December (2)
- November (3)
- October (3)
- September (4)
- August (1)
- July (1)
- May (4)
- April (6)
- March (4)
- February (3)
- 2012
- 2011
- December (2)
- November (2)
- October (4)
- September (1)
- August (2)
- July (6)
- June (2)
- May (3)
- April (3)
- March (2)
- 2010
- 2009
- December (2)
- November (1)
- October (3)
- September (1)
- August (1)
- July (1)
- June (2)
- April (1)
- March (2)
- February (2)
- January (1)
- 2008
- My blog
- Post new blog entry
- All blogs
gain calibration run 15
Updated on Fri, 2015-11-13 14:03. Originally created by bouchet on 2015-11-13 14:03.
15 pulser runs were taken on Feb,24th (run 16055075 to 16055093)
This pdf file shows :
This pdf file shows :
- top : ladder Id's vs channel Id's (x-axis) : 4 channels / A128 chip are usually fired so we should see 4 bands (left panel = P side ; right panel = N side)
- bottom : signal [ADC] vs channel Id's (x-axis) (left panel = P side ; right panel = N side)
- there are some runs were no pulsers are seen (calibration not possible)
- there are pulsers were only 1 pulser is seen on N-side (calibration still possible)
- when both P and N sides have pulsers, the amplitude of the signal is much bigger on N-side : it was not expected (am i missing a detail during the configuration of these runs ?)
»
- bouchet's blog
- Login or register to post comments